<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Who Plans Whom? &#187; odds and enders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/tag/odds-and-enders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whoplanswhom.com</link>
	<description>Who plans whom, who directs and dominates whom, who assigns to other people their station in life, and who is to have his due allotted by others? — F.A. Hayek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 16:07:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Odds and Enders for Feb. 24</title>
		<link>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2010/odds-and-enders-for-feb-24/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2010/odds-and-enders-for-feb-24/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coercion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odds and enders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persuasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoplanswhom.com/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~ An Anti-Stack Manifesto <p>George Donnelly makes two contributions today. The first is <a href="http://georgedonnelly.com/opinion/i-am-powerful/trackback">his rebutal</a> to the grieved Joseph Stack, who published a <a href="http://www.t35.com/embeddedart.txt">suicide note</a> online before flying a single-engine plane into an Austin building housing the offices of the Internal Revenue Service on Feb. 18. Stack had claimed he was left no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>~ An Anti-Stack Manifesto</h2>
<p>George Donnelly makes two contributions today. The first is <a href="http://georgedonnelly.com/opinion/i-am-powerful/trackback">his rebutal</a> to the grieved Joseph Stack, who published a <a href="http://www.t35.com/embeddedart.txt">suicide note</a> online before flying a single-engine plane into an Austin building housing the offices of the Internal Revenue Service on Feb. 18. Stack had claimed he was left no other option, stating that &#8220;violence not only is the answer, <em>(sic)</em> it is the only answer.&#8221; Donnelly wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Am I powerless? My vote doesn’t count. My voice is not heard in the corridors of power in Washington. My bank account is too small to fund political change. My salary is siphoned off into FICA taxes, income taxes, gas taxes, mortgage payments, credit card payments and inflated grocery bills before I see a dime. At any time I could be assaulted by the cops, fined by meter maids, tasered by the state police, murdered by the ATF, seized by the FBI or left penniless by the IRS. I am a punching bag standing patiently in line for my turn in the wringer. &#8230;</p>
<p>When I’m frustrated I remember that none of it matters. It doesn’t matter that the wrong candidate won office. He doesn’t rule me! He only has as much power as I voluntarily grant him. I never agreed to be bound by the laws he passes. I live my own life with integrity and honor by following the natural law: I do not aggress against others and I keep my word. &#8230;</p>
<p>As I grow more happiness and independence in my own life, I will help others do the same. I’ll boycott the strategies, agencies, options and involuntary obligations that once led me into vulnerability. I’ll exhort others to do the same. Soon we will be free, happy, at peace and prosperous. I am powerful. I have many options. I can overcome. I can make a better life for myself. I can.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In <a href="http://georgedonnelly.com/libertarian/alignment-with-principles/trackback">another post</a>, &#8220;We Must Live in Alignment with Our Principles,&#8221; Donnelly makes a point I&#8217;ve been reconciling <a href="http://whoplanswhom.com/blog/2010/02/the-pragmatism-of-principles/">in my own mind</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Liberty starts with each of us. If we can’t make the voluntary society happen in our own lives, what hope is there of making it happen on a large scale? Change requires that good people set good examples. If nothing else, your efforts will keep the promise of liberty alive until conditions become more favorable. It’s our best option. No one will make this happen but ourselves. We are the ones we’ve been waiting for.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>~ Answering the &#8216;Yes, But the State is Inevitable&#8217; Falsity</h2>
<p>For context, Benjamin Tucker defined government as &#8220;the subjection of the noninvasive individual to an external will.&#8221; BK Marcus <a href="http://www.blackcrayon.com/essays/utopia/">answered</a> whether government was inevitable.</p>
<blockquote><p>And for me, the question &#8220;Isn&#8217;t some form of State inevitable?&#8221; is like saying <strong><em>We will never get rid of rape and robbery, murder and torture, so what sense does it make to take a principled stance against these things? They will always be with us.</em></strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad to me that such a basic thing as the principled opposition to coercion is considered to be extremist, unreasonable, unrealistic. Why do I have to believe in permanent peace to oppose war? How is it utopian to denounce force?</p>
<p>I share your confidence that force and fraud will always be with us, and I will always oppose them. But Statism is more than the <em>prediction</em> of &#8220;the subjection of the noninvasive individual to an external will.&#8221; Statism is the claim that <em>institutionalized proactive coercion</em> is justified. Anarchism rejects that conclusion&#8221; (emphasis in original).</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>~ The New Normal for Government Services</h2>
<p><a href="http://wendymcelroy.com/news.php?item.3089.1">Wendy McElroy</a> has a post from <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100219/1238398241.shtml">TechDirt</a> about the new ways that government is servicing you. In California, the city of Tracy is going to charge residents $300 and non-residents $400 when the fire department is called to a medical emergency. I would completely support this but for the fact that residents already have to pay for the fire department with taxes. The reason the city is having to take such measures is to pay back the government-backed labor union that lobbies for excessive compensation and funded the city council member&#8217;s election campaigns. The city spends $9 million per year <a href="http://www.idcide.com/citydata/ca/tracy.htm">in a city of 80,000</a> on employee pensions and deposits ¢33 for every dollar the police and fire fighters make in wages.</p>
<p>No charge will be issued when the fire department responds to a car collission or a fire. So the solution is simple enough, according to McElroy: &#8220;In short, if you see someone have a heart attack in the street, you should quickly set a trash bin on fire.&#8221;</p>
<h2>~ Think Small, Change the World</h2>
<p>Libertarian persuasion guru Michael Cloud <a href="http://www.facebook.com/notes/the-advocates-for-self-government/persuasion-power-point-230-think-small-and-change-the-world/315730638949">has some advice</a> and motivation for activists.</p>
<blockquote><p>Because the vital few, the great men and women, the key events were indispensable and necessary to what happened — but they were *not* sufficient to make it happen.</p>
<p>Without the vital, indispensable small actions of many forgotten individuals, the great events would have faltered, fizzled, and failed. &#8230;</p>
<p>Think small. Start small. Work small. For liberty. You can change the world.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>~ Speaking of Changing Minds</h2>
<p>Seth Godin <a href="http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b31569e2012875c6ff1d970c">has a post</a> on the importance of extremists. He concludes:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s interesting to note that an enormous amount of apparently principled argument goes on about relatively tiny movements in where the line is being drawn. In most cases, to paraphrase an old joke, &#8220;we&#8217;ve already figured out what sort of girl you are, now we&#8217;re just arguing about the price.&#8221; It&#8217;s not the principle, in fact, it&#8217;s just the degree of compromise we&#8217;re comfortable with and content to argue over.</p>
<p>And so it&#8217;s left to the zealots. The people at either end have little hope of moving the masses all the way to their end of the argument. Instead, what they do is make it feel safer to change the boundaries, safer to recalibrate the compromise. Over time, as the edges feel more palatable, the masses are more likely to be willing to edge their way closer to one edge or another. Successful zealots don&#8217;t argue to win. They argue to move the goalposts and to make it appear sane to do so.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2010/odds-and-enders-for-feb-24/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odds and Enders for Feb. 22</title>
		<link>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2010/odds-and-enders-for-feb-22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2010/odds-and-enders-for-feb-22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Worth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odds and enders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tarrant County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoplanswhom.com/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[~ Consent of the Governed in Question <p>Two opinion polls are particularly enlightening. According to a <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20100212/pl_bloomberg/aesowriv31_g">CBS-</a><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20100212/pl_bloomberg/aesowriv31_g">New York Times</a><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20100212/pl_bloomberg/aesowriv31_g"> poll</a>, 81 percent of those polled did not want members of congress reelected. Just 15 percent approve of the job congress is doing. Yet unlike the market, government job performance is not indicative [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>~ Consent of the Governed in Question</h2>
<p>Two opinion polls are particularly enlightening. According to a <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20100212/pl_bloomberg/aesowriv31_g">CBS-</a><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20100212/pl_bloomberg/aesowriv31_g">New York Times</a><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20100212/pl_bloomberg/aesowriv31_g"> poll</a>, 81 percent of those polled did not want members of congress reelected. Just 15 percent approve of the job congress is doing. Yet unlike the market, government job performance is not indicative of job security. At least 90 percent of incumbents will get another term, if the <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/bigpicture/reelect.php">historic figures</a> play out.</p>
<p>In a Rasmussen poll, only 21 percent of respondents &#8220;believe that the federal government enjoys the consent of the governed.&#8221; The poll was further broken into the <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/january_2010/65_now_hold_populist_or_mainstream_views">populist class</a> and the political class. According to the site, the populist class, about 65 percent of the nation, trusts individuals to solve problem better than political leaders. The political class, about four percent of the nation, trusts politicians more than individuals.</p>
<p>Of the populist class, only 18 percent believe the government has the consent of the governed and most them view the government as a special interest group. Nearly two-thirds of the political class believe government has consent. That means a despicable 37 percent of the political class, approximately 1.77 million, trust politicians more yet do not believe those politicians have the consent to act.</p>
<h2>~ (Parking) Anarchism in Action</h2>
<p>Without having to use the power of the state, <a href="http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/12/21/ostrom-in-boston/">individuals find an ingenious solution</a> to the parking problem in downtown Boston. It&#8217;s just another example of what F.A. Hayek called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spontaneous_order">spontaneous order</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://whoplanswhom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/boston-parking.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-482" title="boston-parking" src="http://whoplanswhom.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/boston-parking.jpg" alt="" width="342" height="257" /></a></p>
<h2>~ Tarrant County Judge Acted as Prosecutor</h2>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how common this is around the country, but it is hard to image that the judge can be indifferent when he or she is responsible for acting on behalf of the government prosecutor.</p>
<p>From the Fort Worth <a href="http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/02/21/1984785/secret-testimony-judge-acted-as.html">Star-Telegram</a><a href="http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/02/21/1984785/secret-testimony-judge-acted-as.html"> article</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Robert K. &#8220;Bob&#8221; Gill disposed of nearly 8,000 such cases in 14 years as a state district judge before his retirement in 2007. No other judge in Tarrant County handled more&#8230;.</p>
<p>An attorney who regularly represented indigent probationers facing revocation in Gill&#8217;s court has testified that the judge personally negotiated plea deals, a role normally reserved for prosecutors. Rejecting Gill&#8217;s offer often meant a tougher sentence if he later heard the case and decided a violation occurred, the attorney, William H. &#8220;Bill&#8221; Ray, said under oath.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, it is no surprise that lawyers did not complain. They are repeat compulsory customers of Gill&#8217;s <em>services</em>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.star-telegram.com/personas/?plckUserId=d18523b50817651957a003ef4df8902a-839543&amp;insiteUserId=d18523b50817651957a003ef4df8902a-839543">jimposter</a> made a comment on the site that summed up my feelings.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;This was not okay. The system is The State v. the defendant, not the state and the court v. the defendant. The judge&#8217;s role is to be unbiased and neutral and to hear evidence and make decisions based on it. His role is not to negotiate on behalf of the state.  &#8220;How would you feel about the referee catching a pass and then ruling whether it was a completion or not?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<h2>~ Grandview Council Rejects Stimulus Dollars</h2>
<p>In some good news from the Star-Telegram, the <a href="http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/02/19/v-print/1982941/grandview-council-rejects-federal.html">Grandview city council</a> rejected a $500,000 federal earmark to build a new water tower. In the council&#8217;s resolution, the members said &#8220;The city of Grandview does not believe such funding is ethical or constitutional.&#8221; Chet Edward (D-Waco) defended the pork spending, saying that earmarks represent just two percent of the federal budget. The city council may not be so sacrosanct either.</p>
<p>In 2007, the council requested the money for a new water tower but may not have wanted to spend the $225,000 in required matching funds for the project. The main objector to the earmark is also a supporter of the guy running against Edwards in the November general election.</p>
<h2>~ Bob Barr Shouted Down for Opposing Torture</h2>
<p>Bob Barr, the 2008 Libertarian Party presidential candidate, was booed for saying that water boarding is torture. Don&#8217;t praise him so fast. He later said he supports &#8220;enhanced interrogations.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://embed.crooksandliars.com/v/MTE5MTEtMzUwNjc?color=173466" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://embed.crooksandliars.com/v/MTE5MTEtMzUwNjc?color=173466" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
<address>Image credit: <a href="http://www.boston.com/realestate/gallery/parking_space_savers?pg=7">Boston Globe</a></address></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2010/odds-and-enders-for-feb-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odds and Enders for March 6</title>
		<link>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odds and enders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoplanswhom.wordpress.com/2009/03/06/odds-and-enders-for-march-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>~ Beware of atheist</p> <p>Oklahoma state Rep. Todd Thomsen presented a resolution opposing the speaking engagement of famed atheist Richard Dawkins on the University of Oklahoma campus today. If he had his way, Dawkins would be shut up because his &#8220;published statements on the theory of evolution and opinion about those who do not believe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">~ Beware of atheist</span></p>
<p>Oklahoma state Rep. Todd Thomsen presented a resolution opposing the speaking engagement of famed atheist Richard Dawkins on the University of Oklahoma campus today. If he had his way, Dawkins would be shut up because his &#8220;published statements on the theory of evolution and opinion about those who do not believe in the theory are contrary and offensive to the views and opinions of most citizens of Oklahoma.&#8221;</p>
<p>Most ironically, as the <a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/132086.html">Ronald Bailey</a> points out, Thomsen &#8220;introduced another bill in January entitled the &#8220;Scientific Education and Academic Freedom Act.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">~ How to end up on a terror watch list</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote>In reality, this simple list of the potential troublemakers was designed to be a secret intel tool for investigation purposes. Unfortunately, it has morphed into a symbol of governmental inefficiency. Because people are inherently lazy, in leiu of doing any kind of elementary investigation, circumstantial evidence has become the norm for placement on this list.</p>
<p>(via COEDmagazine.com)</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">~ So four months after being elected, the president still hasn&#8217;t proposed any banking reforms</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/05/AR2009030502951.html">Charles Krauthammer</a> wants to know where President Obama&#8217;s priorities lie.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>And yet with our financial house on fire, Obama makes clear both in his speech and his budget that the essence of his presidency will be the transformation of health care, education and energy. Four months after winning the election, six weeks after his swearing-in, Obama has yet to unveil a plan to deal with the banking crisis.  What&#8217;s going on? &#8220;You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,&#8221; said chief of staff Rahm Emanuel. &#8220;This crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not do before.&#8221;  Things. Now we know what they are. The markets&#8217; recent precipitous decline is a reaction not just to the absence of any plausible bank rescue plan, but also to the suspicion that Obama sees the continuing financial crisis as usefully creating the psychological conditions &#8212; the sense of crisis bordering on fear-itself panic &#8212; for enacting his &#8220;Big Bang&#8221; agenda to federalize and/or socialize health care, education and energy, the commanding heights of post-industrial society.  Clever politics, but intellectually dishonest to the core. Health, education and energy &#8212; worthy and weighty as they may be &#8212; are not the cause of our financial collapse. And they are not the cure. The fraudulent claim that they are both cause and cure is the rhetorical device by which an ambitious president intends to enact the most radical agenda of social transformation seen in our lifetime. </p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">~ Quote of the Day</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote>So you can take a market and beat it, tax it, regulate it, subsidize it, flood it with fake money, punish its performers and reward its losers, hobble its capital sector, strangle consumers, nationalize stuff at will, and erect every barrier to trade and cooperation, and STILL call it a market. When the scheme fails, it&#8217;s the free market that failed, so clearly we need the totalitarian state to sweep into action. &#8211; Jeffery Tucker</p>
<p>(via <a href="http://bkmarcus.com/blog/2009/03/a-what-sort-of-market-again">lowercase liberty</a>, via <a href="http://blog.mises.org/archives/009559.asp">Mises.org blog</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">~ Past returns do not guarantee future results, we hope</span></p>
<p>When the president said yesterday at a press conference that now was a good time to jump into the stock market, you know we haven&#8217;t hit bottom. Worrisome still, he doesn&#8217;t understand a straightforward financial comparison tool like P/E ratio, and yet he wants to change the very &#8220;foundation&#8221; of the economy, as he said in his address to congress two weeks ago. Very alarming.</p>
<p>It looks like we have a good while to go until the P/E ratio does get into some historical norms, according to smarter people than me.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Obama cleartly doesn’t know what he is talking about and his apologists should be ashamed. If you were to follow his suggestion and apply the “Price to Earnings Ratio” to current market prices &#8211; you would not invest in the Market at this time  &#8211; you would sell.   Using the “Price to Earnings Ratio” as a guide,  the S &amp; P will need to drop to 500 (it is currently at 702.80) a fall of additional 200 points or an additional loss of 28% before becoming an attractive buy prospect.  The “Price to Earnings Ratio” would indicate that the DJIA should be trading at 5500 not the 6781 it is currently trading at &#8211; so the DJIA would need to fall an additional 1300  points (a 20% loss) before becoming an attractive “buy” prospect.  </p></blockquote>
<p> <span style="font-weight:bold;">~ The Daily Show at the White House</span></p>
<table style="font-family:arial;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:11px;line-height:normal;color:rgb(51,51,51);background-color:rgb(245,245,245);" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="360">
<tbody>
<tr style="background-color:rgb(229,229,229);" valign="middle">
<td style="padding:2px 1px 0 5px;"><a target="_blank" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);text-decoration:none;font-weight:bold;" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/">The Daily Show With Jon Stewart</a></td>
<td style="text-align:right;font-weight:bold;padding:2px 5px 0;">Mon &#8211; Thurs 11p / 10c</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14px;" valign="middle">
<td style="padding:2px 1px 0 5px;" colspan="2"><a target="_blank" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);text-decoration:none;font-weight:bold;" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-march-5-2009/white-house-press-corps">White House Press Corps</a><a></a></td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14px;background-color:rgb(53,53,53);" valign="middle">
<td colspan="2" style="overflow:hidden;width:360px;text-align:right;padding:2px 5px 0;"><a target="_blank" style="color:rgb(150,222,255);text-decoration:none;font-weight:bold;" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/">www.thedailyshow.com</a></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="middle">
<td style="padding:0;" colspan="2"></td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:18px;" valign="middle">
<td style="padding:0;" colspan="2">
<table style="text-align:center;margin:0;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr valign="middle">
<td style="width:33%;padding:3px;"><a target="_blank" style="font-family:arial;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:10px;line-height:normal;color:rgb(51,51,51);text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes">Daily Show<br />
<br />Full Episodes</a></td>
<td style="width:33%;padding:3px;"><a target="_blank" style="font-family:arial;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:10px;line-height:normal;color:rgb(51,51,51);text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor</a></td>
<td style="width:33%;padding:3px;"><a target="_blank" style="font-family:arial;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;font-size:10px;line-height:normal;color:rgb(51,51,51);text-decoration:none;" href="http://www.jokes.com/">Joke of the Day</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odds and Enders for March 5</title>
		<link>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odds and enders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoplanswhom.wordpress.com/2009/03/05/odds-and-enders-for-march-5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>~ The Guantanamo File: a shameful legacy of the Bush presidency</p> <p>It <a href="http://www.antiwar.com/worthington/?articleid=14343">speaks</a> for itself.</p> <p>I also hope that it provides a compelling explanation of how that same government, under the leadership of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld, established a prison in which the overwhelming majority of those held – at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~ The Guantanamo File: a shameful legacy of the Bush presidency</p>
<p>It <a href="http://www.antiwar.com/worthington/?articleid=14343">speaks</a> for itself.</p>
<blockquote><p>I also hope that it provides a compelling explanation of how that same government, under the leadership of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld, established a prison in which the overwhelming majority of those held – at least 93 percent of the 779 men and boys imprisoned in total – were either completely innocent people, seized as a result of dubious intelligence or sold for bounty payments, or Taliban foot soldiers, recruited to fight an inter-Muslim civil war that began long before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and that had nothing to do with al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, or international terrorism.</p></blockquote>
<p>~ Thomas Woods, intellectual bodyguard</p>
<p>His <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/woods/woods103.html">new book</a> is already a New York Times bestseller — without any major media publicity.</p>
<blockquote><p>We are learning what it is like to live in an Orwell novel. Our television screens are filled with people offering choices between idiotic and suicidal option A and idiotic and suicidal option B. We are being told that we must at least partially nationalize our banks, prop up zombie companies, lower interest rates to zero, and pass stimulus packages in order to escape the fate of Japan – which, um, partially nationalized its banks, propped up zombie companies, lowered interest rates to zero, and passed eight stimulus packages. We have a president who tells us we cannot rely on the free market to get us out of this mess because the free market is what got us here, as if the Federal Reserve and its bubble-inducing monetary policy never existed. </p></blockquote>
<p>~ Pa. schools <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/odd_ebay_pricey_mistake;_ylt=Ar7.kNW6TPf0OI9udjjF0ykjr7sF">sells trailer for $1</a></p>
<p>Noticeably absent from the article is what disciplinary action is being taken against the person responsible for costing the school at least $5000 in revenue. Might that be because it would cost the taxpayers even more to fire the person responsible?</p>
<blockquote><p>The East Stroudsburg School District was attempting to sell seven used classroom trailers, but an error in its ad on the online auction site allowed someone to bid and buy one trailer for only a dollar. The district had purchased the trailers three years ago for about $46,000 each. With transportation and setup costs, the total came to around $60,000. Officials were expecting to get around $5,000 to $10,000 per trailer on eBay.</p></blockquote>
<p>~ It’s not the whole Internet, but it’s a start</p>
<p>Former vice president Al Gore <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0309/Gore_applies_for_web_domain.html?showall">submitted a proposal</a> for a new top-level Web domain, .eco.</p>
<p>And Gore, who never actually quite claimed to have invented the Internet, though he did have some hand in getting it up and running, can claim to have partially invented a domain.</p>
<p>~ Pure Ownage: Thomas Friedman’s Five Worst Predictions</p>
<p>    Friedman is a three-time Pulitzer Prize winner, a staple of The New York Times, and a bestselling author, and thus this prediction should be taken very seriously—in some alternate universe where the news media is a meritocracy and Thomas Friedman is a competent observer of the world and its workings. The rest of us can probably relax.</p>
<p>The highlight for me:</p>
<blockquote><p>Then, a month into the Afghanistan conflict, Friedman complained that “the hand-wringing has already begun over how long this might last” and advised readers to “take a deep breath,” noting that Afghanistan is “far away.” Besides, Friedman had “no doubt, for now, that the Bush team has a military strategy for winning a long war.” A month later, he noted in passing that “America has won the war in Afghanistan” and that “the Taliban are gone,” though he did express some concern about “all the nonsense written in the press about the concern for ‘civilian casualties’,” a term he took to using with scare quotes. Seven years later, civilian casualties remain a major item of concern for Afghan’s in the non-won war against the non-gone Taliban.</p></blockquote>
<p>~ The war on drugs, the war on guns</p>
<p>The worst elements of the drug war are now taking precedent in the war on guns, according to the Cato Institute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odds and Enders for March 4</title>
		<link>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odds and enders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoplanswhom.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/odds-and-enders-for-march-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>~ On the president’s <a href="http://mises.org/story/3339">entrepreneurship spending</a>:</p> <p>Contrary to popular myth, startup companies do not generate many new jobs, and actually create net job losses after their first year. Findings from the Bureau of Labor Statistics support this fact. For example, in 1998 there were 152,668 people employed by new startups in the leisure and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~ On the president’s <a href="http://mises.org/story/3339">entrepreneurship spending</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Contrary to popular myth, startup companies do not generate many new jobs, and actually create net job losses after their first year. Findings from the Bureau of Labor Statistics support this fact. For example, in 1998 there were 152,668 people employed by new startups in the leisure and hospitality industry, a number that declined year after year, until there were only 105,941 people employed by those same startups in 2002 — a 31% loss. The figures are similar for nearly all industries ….</p>
<p>While the average new business is a waste of resources, what about other startups that have generated millions of jobs, billions of dollars in revenue, and grown into multinational corporations? We can think of Google, FedEx, Dell, Microsoft, eBay, and many other startup companies that have benefited many people’s lives. The common link between all of these companies, however, is the market solution of venture-capital funding, not government intervention.</p></blockquote>
<p>~ Stream the R3VOLution</p>
<p>While <a href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/cool-sites-to-stream-live-video-from-your-phone-to-the-net/">older devices</a> weren’t able to transmit large amounts of live video in the bandwidth that was available to them, new 3G and 4G cell phone networks are supporting the ability to be able to transmit live, legible video from something as small as your cell phone, Smartphone, or Pocket PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odds and Enders for March 3</title>
		<link>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odds and enders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Liberty Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoplanswhom.wordpress.com/2009/03/03/odds-and-enders-for-march-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>~ I started uploading Ron Paul’s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9PIsYoHLGs">speech</a> from Feb. 28 to the first-ever Texas Liberty Campaign convention. Not bad a job for my first video.</p> <p>~ The Green Energy Fantasy</p> <p>Regardless of one’s views on global warming–and there is ample scientific evidence to reject the claim that man-made carbon emissions are causing catastrophe–the fact [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>~ I started uploading Ron Paul’s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9PIsYoHLGs">speech</a> from Feb. 28 to the first-ever Texas Liberty Campaign convention. Not bad a job for my first video.</p>
<p>~ The Green Energy Fantasy</p>
<blockquote><p>Regardless of one’s views on global warming–and there is ample scientific evidence to reject the claim that man-made carbon emissions are causing catastrophe–the fact is that kneecapping the fossil fuel industry while diverting tax dollars into expensive, impractical forms of energy will not be an economic boon, but an economic disaster. – Keith Lockitch</p></blockquote>
<p>~ Smash the state. Thanks to Free Talk Live host Ian Freeman, you can now download a free audio book of &#8220;<a href="http://freekeene.com/free-audiobook/">The Market for Liberty</a>&#8220;. Simply amazing. Then again, why not also try Simply Anarchy for more ideas?</p>
<blockquote><p>That’s where you’ll find this quote from Frederic Bastiat: The state is the great fictitious entity by which everyone seeks to live at the expense of everyone else.</p></blockquote>
<p>~ And another from Lysander Spooner:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is self-evident that no number of men, by conspiring, and calling themselves a government, can acquire any rights whatever over other men, or other men’s property, which they had not before, as individuals. And whenever any number of men, calling themselves a government, do anything to another man, or to his property, which they had no right to do as individuals, they thereby declare themselves trespassers, robbers, or murderers, according to the nature of their acts.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whoplanswhom.com/blog/2009/odds-and-enders-for-march-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.whoplanswhom.com @ 2012-02-07 10:54:29 -->
