Currently viewing the tag: "non-aggression principle"
Last week’s election results are official, and by a vote of 31-7, prohibition of any substance has been overwhelmingly abolished in the geo-political entity known as Free Grafton.
Bob “Weeda Claus” Constantine (Free State Party) easily defeated Misty the Cat (Maoist Party) to become ambassador-elect to unfree Grafton and other coercive forms of [...]
The tax sinkhole known as the United States military is projecting more development cost overruns in connection with the F-35 joint strike fighter.
Already the most expensive weapons program in history and years behind schedule, writing of approximately 35 million lines of computer code and other testing could cost an additional $5 billion [...]
On Nov. 2, tens of millions of Americans will exercise their political franchise to play their part in shaping the future of the country, or so the story goes.
I do not like it any more than anyone else. Most voters will gleefully cast their ballots for politicians openly seeking the legal sanction to aggress [...]
It is typically conceded that a starving man is not free, and this marks the alleged defining flaw of a free market, the commoditization of labor. The contention is that the relationship between employers and employees is really no different than the relationship between muggers and their victims: obey or die. Typically, market opponents [...]
For context, I have written before why libertarians, and particularly libertarians committed to small government, should support open immigration as a matter of principle. Further, I have given a consequentialist argument for open immigration and what that entails.
For me, the least impactful line of argument I would think is the constitutional argument. That so [...]
Before I had run out of excuses, as one bumper sticker chides, I was still a minarchist — whereby I believed the only purported role of the state was the defensive protection of individual rights. I was still fiercely opposed to immigration restrictions, based on my reading Ayn Rand, who was obviously sympathetic to immigrants [...]
The life of Joseph Stack, the man the FBI believes flew his single-engine airplane into an office complex housing the Internal Revenue Service, ended in tragedy Thursday. It has been reported that at least one other man inside the Austin building was killed following the impact and many others were sent to the [...]
Who plans whom, who directs and dominates whom, who assigns to other people their station in life, and who is to have his due allotted by others? — Friedrich HayekArchives
Categories
Tags
constitution liberty market government feature rights electoral politics police YouTube labor the state anarchoblogs authority property world libertarianism video monopoly anarchism money local war peace coercion taxesNews and Views
- Antiwar.com
- Anarchoblogs
- Arm Your Mind for Liberty
- Austro-Athenian Empire
- Bleeding Heart Libertarians
- Center for a Stateless Society
- DFW Alliance of the Libertarian Left
- Foundation for Economic Education
- Free Advice
- Free Keene
- Glenn Greenwald
- Incinerating Presuppositionalism
- KN@PPSTER
- Libérale et libertaire
- No State
- Pro Libertate
- Rad Geek
- Reddit: Libertarian
- She Calls Me Artemis
Meta
Political Violence Makes Things Worse
I have heard people who are disgruntled with the actions of the federal government sometimes romanticize the notion of a violent backlash by armed resistors. It is not so much done with the understanding that the disgruntled person would necessarily approve of the armed rebellion, but they convey that violence would put the government back [...]